Re: [GZG] Converting WW2 to Sc-fi (was re: Brian's questions)

Yeah, I always thought the Centurion had a futuristic look to it.

I think that for modern tanks, the Swedish S, the Merkava, the LEO II
and the LeClerc have the most futuristic look.

DISCLAIMER:  I'm talking about looks, NOT capabilities.  So let's not go
there.

On 8/26/05, Eli Arndt <emu2020@comcast.net> wrote:
> Bodies look like they would work well, might need turret mods.  As for
> post WW2 stuff, the Centurian is a definite.	Many of the Cold War era
> and modern soviet tanks just scream sci-fi.  I think it's the dome
> turrets.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: gzg-l-bounces@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
> [mailto:gzg-l-bounces@lists.csua.berkeley.edu] On Behalf Of Brian B
> Sent: Friday, August 26, 2005 11:08 AM
> To: gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
> Subject: Re: [GZG] Converting WW2 to Sc-fi (was re: Brian's questions)
> 
> On 8/26/05, Eli Arndt <emu2020@comcast.net> wrote:
> > I'm finding that a Russian T-34 or an IS-3 make for a good base. 
Some
> > of the Panzer IVs look promising.  I haven't looked into British
armor
> > for this.
> 
> I was thinking of the Matilda or the Churchill, as hover conversions.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gzg-l mailing list
> Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
> http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l
>

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l