Prev: Re: [GZG] some size debates Next: Re: [GZG] some size debates

RE: [GZG] some size debates

From: "R. Bryett" <rbryett@m...>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 12:01:27 +1000
Subject: RE: [GZG] some size debates

Ooops! Sorry... I just realised I miss-read the posting and 1200m was
the
length of a ship compared to B5, not B5 itself.

My bad, Robert Bryett...

-----Original Message-----
From: gzg-l-bounces@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
[mailto:gzg-l-bounces@lists.csua.berkeley.edu]On Behalf Of R. Bryett
Sent: Tuesday, 19 July 2005 11:39
To: gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
Subject: RE: [GZG] some size debates

>>>> I think the best value (based on comparisons with B5, the size of
which
_is_ known) is between 1200 and 1320m. <<<<

Isn't B5 supposed to be about five miles (8047 metres) long?

Best regards, Robert Bryett.

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l

Prev: Re: [GZG] some size debates Next: Re: [GZG] some size debates