Prev: Re: Quality in FT III Next: RE: Fire Control lock-on (was: Re: [FT] squadron suggestions)

Re: Fire Control lock-on

From: Infojunky <infojunky@c...>
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 21:03:18 +0100
Subject: Re: Fire Control lock-on

tsarith@io.com wrote:
> 
> 
> I'm delurking for a while to comment on this.  Right now I am just 
> sticking to the original idea, not the commentsback on it.
> 
> I don't think a lock on roll is a good mechanic.

Heck right now I'm wondering what Lockon has to do with anything.
Most of the weapons I know of that require locks are fire and forget 
missiles. A lot of anti-shipping missiles are fired on bearings, and 
don't aquire their target till they get to the preset scan-on distance, 
kinda like SMs do under the current rules.

A lot of what is electronic warfare takes place at the detection phase 
of any engagement, so to simulate that we would need detailed detection 
rules and equipment.
-- 
Evyn

"Scientia Est Potentia"

http://ceecom.net

Prev: Re: Quality in FT III Next: RE: Fire Control lock-on (was: Re: [FT] squadron suggestions)