Re:
From: Charles Lee <xarcht@y...>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 17:01:21 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re:
I agree on simplest solutions.
Noam Izenberg <noam.izenberg@jhuapl.edu> wrote:Martin wrote:
> Maybe I'm too simple a man, but in essence, isn't lock on already
> included?
> When we roll a d6 and there is some significant chance that a weapon
> doesn't hit, what is it modeling?
I feel exactly this way.
Ralph wrote:
> Personally, I would like the "Unspend thrust gives an evasive bonus"
> idea
> the most.
I like this also, and there have been various modelings of evasive or
extreme maneuvers posted in the past.
No one will be surprised that I still favor stealth through range band
modification. And ECM as "+x MU to measured range". Both are simple
and require no extra step.
---
"Whether you believe you can or believe you can't, either way you're
right." -- Henry Ford
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com