FT Fighters (was: RE: Full Thrust vs Starmada)
From: "Robertson, Brendan" <Brendan.Robertson@d...>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 15:50:32 +1000
Subject: FT Fighters (was: RE: Full Thrust vs Starmada)
I prefer a mix of both (see the last rebuild I tried that created more
problems at the same time).
Fighters as PDS with an ordinance chit makes it worth making that one
major
anti-ship swarm attack but then you're stuck with doing a couple of
points
of damage (even when 20 squadrons swarm in).
Brendan
'Neath Southern Skies
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
> [mailto:owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU]On Behalf Of Brian Burger
> Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 3:15 PM
> To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
> Subject: Re: Full Thrust vs Starmada
>
> This gets to my two favourite FT fighter-fix ideas:
>
> 1. Treat fighter main armament as PDS instead of a half-range
> B1. You do
> *1* point on a 6 vs ships then. (PDS don't get re-rolls vs ships, do
> they? They shouldn't...)
>
> 2. Discard the 'standard fighter' entirely. Allow interceptors, torp
> fighters, and that's about it. (This is pretty much the same as
> Laserlight's proposal above, taken a short step further.)
IMPORTANT
1. Before opening any attachments, please check for viruses.
2. This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain confidential
information
for the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient,
please contact the sender and delete all copies of this email.
3. Any views expressed in this e-mail are those of the sender and are
not
a statement of Australian Government Policy unless otherwise stated.
4. Electronic addresses published in this email are not conspicuous
publications
and DVA does not consent to the receipt of commercial electronic
messages.
5. Please go to http://www.dva.gov.au/feedback.htm#sub to unsubscribe
emails
of this type from DVA.
6. Finally, please do not remove this notice.