Prev: RE: [VV] Organics and other flavoring - RE: [VV] Vectorverse -- Ok so far? Next: Re: [VV] Gate defence

Re: Game balance (no longer really very VV-related)

From: Oerjan Ohlson <oerjan.ohlson@t...>
Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2005 10:41:21 +0100
Subject: Re: Game balance (no longer really very VV-related)

Jared Hilal wrote:

> > So EPV ought, for maximum balance/diversity, to be defined as equal
> > to SPV? (Which is itself probably some function of TPV
>
>I don't think this would work out, because some items that increase
>strategic value actually reduce tactical use.

As Roger noted, the SPV is a function of - among several other things -
the 
TPV (ie., the tactical combat power is one of several factors which 
determine the unit's strategic value), so it does work out... *if* you 
manage to determine the SPV before the campaign starts.

Since this probably won't happen, in reality each player has to figure
out 
what designs give him/her the highest SPV per buck. Quite often several
(or 
even all) of the players come up with very similar solutions :-/

Later,

Oerjan
oerjan.ohlson@telia.com

"Life is like a sewer.
  What you get out of it, depends on what you put into it."
-Hen3ry

Prev: RE: [VV] Organics and other flavoring - RE: [VV] Vectorverse -- Ok so far? Next: Re: [VV] Gate defence