Re: [OT]Wither Canada? And Australias Abrahms
From: Warbeads@a...
Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2005 21:47:06 EST
Subject: Re: [OT]Wither Canada? And Australias Abrahms
In a message dated 2/5/05 7:41:08 AM Pacific Standard Time,
laranzu@ozemail.com.au writes:
On the other hand, the United States is the only country
that *could* launch any kind of serious invasion of us
this decade. And if the US did decide to invade, the kind
of tank we had wouldn't make much difference. So if our
army buying the Abrams makes us popular with the US,
we're decreasing the risk of invasion :-)
cheers,
Hugh
Actually it's logistically a nightmare unless your subs (unclassified
reports can neither be confirmed or denied) are completely accounted
for -- as in
sunk. And that assumes that your Air Force was completely neutralized
by
Naval Air plus long range USAF assets. And that the amount of troops
needed to
subdue the military (although hunting down your snake-eaters would be a
nightmare) was available for the duration.
Mostly though it would make no sense for the USA to attack Australia.
The
geopolitical realities make such a scenario at least 100% laughable.
Who
would be our most dependable (and honest in council) Asian Nation if we
broke
with Australia? Singapore?? Too much tightrope walking to let
themselves
become associated with any superpower outside the region. Taiwan???
Maybe in
their spare time they stop looking west but right now they are the
'invisible'
nation to most countries. Indonesia, ?!?!? HAH! Certainly not
Malaysia even
with Dr. M out of power. Perhaps Japan? (Focused a lot on N. Korea and
PRC
understandably.) Definitely not Vietnam (except maybe dealing with the
PRC
threat). Thailand - Too independent and unaligned by choice. Never mind
about
Cambodia, Laos, Burma or the minor states of Oceania.
Gracias,
Glenn "warbeads"