Prev: Re: [VV] Vectorverse FTL Next: Re: [VV] Vectorverse FTL

RE: [VV] Vectorverse FTL

From: "Robertson, Brendan" <Brendan.Robertson@d...>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 16:48:24 +1100
Subject: RE: [VV] Vectorverse FTL

So which one to drop?
Wormhole/gate are the similar technology, but there would need to be a
of wormholes for a viable empire.

'Neath Southern Skies

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Laserlight []
> Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 4:29 PM
> To:
> Subject: Re: [VV] Vectorverse FTL
> From: "Robertson, Brendan"
> > FTL Tier 1: , Tier 2:, Tier 3:
> I'm wondering if perhaps it would be better to have only two modes of
> FTL?	A lot of the interesting situations in history have arisen when
> one culture developed a new mode of transportation, and ran into
> another culture which didn't have that mode.	For instance, the Aztecs
> | Hindus | East Africans had foot travel; the Spanish | English |
> Arabs had that, but also had ships (and the tech that allowed them to
> build ships). 

1. Before opening any attachments, please check for viruses. 
2. This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain confidential
   for the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, 
   please contact the sender and delete all copies of this email. 
3. Any views expressed in this e-mail are those of the sender and are
   a statement of Australian Government Policy unless otherwise stated. 
4. Electronic addresses published in this email are not conspicuous
   and DVA does not consent to the receipt of commercial electronic
5. Please go to to unsubscribe

   of this type from DVA. 
6. Finally, please do not remove this notice.  

Prev: Re: [VV] Vectorverse FTL Next: Re: [VV] Vectorverse FTL