Prev: Re: [FH] Vectorverse was Re: NAC - American style Next: Re: [FH] Vectorverse - License?

Re: [FH] Vectorverse was Re: NAC - American style

From: Donald Hosford <Hosford.Donald@a...>
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 03:30:56 -0500
Subject: Re: [FH] Vectorverse was Re: NAC - American style

Are we going to have a single FTL mechanism?

Or will the more advanced nations have better/faster ones?

Laserlight wrote:

>One thing we do need, though, is FTL mechanism.  I'd say jump points,
>sort of like Alderson points except covering a larger volume.	It's
>most efficient to arrive at the center but you can modify your arrival
>position off to one side by quite a bit -- enough that a fixed station
>can't guard the entire arrival aread.
>  
>

This would significantly raise the cost to "armor" a jump point.  :-)

Donald Hosford

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.2 - Release Date: 1/28/05

Prev: Re: [FH] Vectorverse was Re: NAC - American style Next: Re: [FH] Vectorverse - License?