Re: Re: [SGII] Fire of AT Missiles at disperesed tagets
From: <kevinbalentine@c...>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 22:44:44 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: [SGII] Fire of AT Missiles at disperesed tagets
>
> From: "laserlight@quixnet.net" <laserlight@quixnet.net>
> Date: 2005/01/26 Wed PM 09:37:58 GMT
> To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
> Subject: Re: [SGII] Fire of AT Missiles at disperesed tagets
>
> > Because "stun" offers such a consequence free environment...
>
> Heh. The consequence is that the other side know they can safely
stick up
> their head and shoot at you.
>
That really depends on what you do them after they are stunned. :-0