Re: [SGII] Fire of AT Missiles at disperesed tagets

At 7:21 PM +0100 1/26/05, John Atkinson wrote:
>
>The sort of idiots that would put a stun setting on an infantry weapon
>and expect it to be used on a regular basis are the sort of idiots
>that would wig out when that 1 in 10,000 guy with a weak heart drops
>over dead.  Using even non-lethal force indiscriminately is not
>consequence-free.

Non-lethal weapons do have a place in modern warfighting. But they' 
need to be handled as if they're deadly. Mandating their use in place 
of deadly weapons is however sheer and utter folly.

>Not saying non-lethal options aren't a good thing.  That's what
>Surefire underbarrel flashlights are for--anyone who doesn't consider
>that a non-lethal force option hasn't gotten blinded by one lately.

They're great. Nice and bright too. I only have their inexpensive ABS 
plastic model and not one of their weapon lights.

-- 
--
----------------------------------------------------------------
-		  Data Center Operations Group		      -
-		http://web.turner.com/data_center/	       -
----------------------------------------------------------------
- Ryan Montieth Gill		       One CNN Center SE0813 E -
- Internet Technologies   --   Data Center Operations Manager  -
- Hours 11am - 7pm Mon - Fri	    (8Sdc, 10Sdc IT@3Ndc)      -
- Cellular: 404-545-6205	     e-mail: Ryan.Gill@cnn.com -
- Office: 404-588-6191					       -
----------------------------------------------------------------
-	      Emergency Power-off != Door release!	       -
----------------------------------------------------------------