Prev: Re: [SGII] Fire of AT Missiles at disperesed tagets Next: RE: [SGII] Fire of AT Missiles at disperesed tagets

RE: RE: [SGII] Fire of AT Missiles at disperesed tagets

From: "Katrina Brown" <mwbrown@s...>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 20:42:06 -0800
Subject: RE: RE: [SGII] Fire of AT Missiles at disperesed tagets

Wasteful.  You've got to keep something that can shoot at tanks handy,
can't
cut loose against a single guy.  Military weapons and doctrine are more
about wounding than killing.

Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[mailto:owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU] On Behalf Of
Beth.Fulton@csiro.au
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 8:18 PM
To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Subject: [Norton AntiSpam] RE: [SGII] Fire of AT Missiles at disperesed
tagets

G'day,

Dumb Beth question time...

> And since it would never be doctrine to shoot them at
> individuals, it won't change....

Why?

Thanks

Beth

Prev: Re: [SGII] Fire of AT Missiles at disperesed tagets Next: RE: [SGII] Fire of AT Missiles at disperesed tagets