RE: RE: [SGII] Fire of AT Missiles at disperesed tagets
From: "Katrina Brown" <mwbrown@s...>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 20:42:06 -0800
Subject: RE: RE: [SGII] Fire of AT Missiles at disperesed tagets
Wasteful. You've got to keep something that can shoot at tanks handy,
can't
cut loose against a single guy. Military weapons and doctrine are more
about wounding than killing.
Mike
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[mailto:owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU] On Behalf Of
Beth.Fulton@csiro.au
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 8:18 PM
To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Subject: [Norton AntiSpam] RE: [SGII] Fire of AT Missiles at disperesed
tagets
G'day,
Dumb Beth question time...
> And since it would never be doctrine to shoot them at
> individuals, it won't change....
Why?
Thanks
Beth