Re: Armour and Cover Answer
From: "Allan Goodall" <agoodall@a...>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 08:10:42 -0600
Subject: Re: Armour and Cover Answer
On 10 Jan 2005 at 23:00, The GZG Digest wrote:
> From: "laserlight@quixnet.net" <laserlight@quixnet.net>
> Whereas I'm not sure that PA should get any extra armor benefit from
> hiding in a bush.
Due to a lack of designer notes, we don't know what the cover shift is
supposed to _truly_ entail. I always assumed that being in a bush not
only made it harder to be seen (represented by the range die shift) but
harder to see the centre of mass of a target, thus making it difficult
to
hit a target head on (thus the die shift to the Impact versus Armour
roll).
Also, if you look at the bushes on my game board and apply the 1" = 10
metres game scale, you often have 10 or more metres of bush to shoot
through.
Does it make sense for PA to get an armour benefit for hiding behind a
bush? Probably not. Does it make sense for PA to get an armour benefit
for being in a brushy area the size of a large copse? Probably.
I give PA the armour shift because I feel that a piece of lichen on the
game board represents more than a single bush. It also makes the game
easier to play, without all sorts of special rules. Considering some of
the other issues in SG2 that have never been resolved or which give
stranger results, I don't sweat the open die shift for PA.
---
Allan Goodall http://www.hyperbear.com
agoodall@att.net agoodall@hyperbear.com
"O would some power the giftie gie us to see ourselves as others see us"
- Robert Burns, "To A Louse"