Prev: [OT] Outlook settings was RE: [CON] ECC VIII Next: Re: [SG 2] Infantry weapons combinations

Re: [OT] Outlook settings was RE: [CON] ECC VIII

From: Doug Evans <devans@n...>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 07:27:42 -0600
Subject: Re: [OT] Outlook settings was RE: [CON] ECC VIII

Thanks for correcting my failure to change subject! Do as I say, not as
I
do...

My employer uses a totally different mail system, so I'm working on
hearsay, but when I said M$ Outlook, I was also thinking M$ Exchange,
which
I think is the mail server software you hook up with, which prolly means
you're SOL for having a meaningful correction.

The weird thing was that your post five minutes after the
position-of-women-in-societies post DIDN'T have the attachment.

Clue one? Not I.

The_Beast

owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU wrote on 12/23/2004 07:08:17 AM:

> G'day,
>
> > Beth, that post had a M$ Outlook(?) supplied attachment
> that probably
> > confused the list server.  Your recent comments that
> included 'Working
> as a
> > woman in science...' also had such an attachment: winmail.dat.
>
> The latest stuff was sent from my laptop where I've turned off
> absolutely every thing that isn't plain text so I'm at a loss. Any
> exchange server afficinados (or people know of sites) that have a
> checklist I can tick off to try and stop this problem from
> happening?
>
> Thanks
>
> Beth
>

Prev: [OT] Outlook settings was RE: [CON] ECC VIII Next: Re: [SG 2] Infantry weapons combinations