RE: [FT] Crew quality house rules

Most of those examples relate to Damage Control (for which automation
can't
yet make a "leap of faith" to fix a problem).

In the automation of FT, crew quality doesn't matter once the targetting
solution is locked into the computers.	Where it does matter is in the
maintainance of the systems, damage control and initiative.

Brendan
'Neath Southern Skies

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jalinth [mailto:jalinth@kingston.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 7:15 PM
> To: gzg-l@scotch.csua.berkeley.edu
> Subject: Re: [FT] Crew quality house rules [Longish]
> 
> >The issue is one of training. 
> >
> >1) How well does the crew do their job under ideal 
> circumstances? This 
> >would be the "reading the dials and instruments", and most navi....
> 
> Having just re-read the Honor Harrington Series I have a 
> couple quotes 
> from the books that might help prove the advantage of a good 
> crew. Or at 
> least interest someone enough to go check the books out, they 
> are quite 
> good. 
> -----------------
> 
> Well Longer then I thought it would be when I thought this 
> message up. 
> Could probably cut down more/make more coherent but meh, it's 
> 3 AM and I 
> am off to bed.
> ---------
> Aaron Davis
> jalinth@kingston.net

IMPORTANT 
1. Before opening any attachments, please check for viruses. 
2. This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain confidential
information 
   for the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, 
   please contact the sender and delete all copies of this email. 
3. Any views expressed in this e-mail are those of the sender and are
not 
   a statement of Australian Government Policy unless otherwise stated. 
4. Electronic addresses published in this email are not conspicuous
publications 
   and DVA does not consent to the receipt of commercial electronic
messages. 
5. Please go to http://www.dva.gov.au/feedback.htm#sub to unsubscribe
emails

   of this type from DVA. 
6. Finally, please do not remove this notice.