Re: Initiative - was RE: Piquet
From: John Atkinson <johnmatkinson@g...>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:08:47 +0200
Subject: Re: Initiative - was RE: Piquet
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 05:41:39 -0400, Laserlight <laserlight@quixnet.net>
wrote:
> I said:
> a) I was thinking of Col Grossman's book _On Killing_
Grossman overstates and oversimplifies the issue. Motivating people
to kill is easy and the Army has been doing it for years. And we make
jokes about it afterwards. :)
> b) we need to allow for troops who aren't decently trained--IF or PAU
> militia, for instance.
The other issue is that people hesitate to kill people. But the
definition of 'people' varies. To a Japanese, anyone not Japanese is
not People, hence Rape of Nanking, torture and rape of Korean women,
beheading of Allied POWs, etc.
To a Nazi, Jews are not people so it's OK to shove them in gas chambers.
To the average sub-Saharan African, people from other tribes are not
people, so chopping a few thousand of them up with machetes is no big
deal.
Grossman is, from what I recall, dealing mostly with 'Mericans and
extrapolates to the rest of the world.
In short, I find it highly unlikely that any but the worst-trained
levies are going to sit and chill with good targets in front of them.
Besides which, motivating people to pull triggers is NCO business at
the fireteam/squad level, and not appropriate subject matter for a
wargame at the platoon/company level.
John