Re: Salvo Missles vs. MT missiles
From: "Laserlight" <laserlight@q...>
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2004 20:11:27 -0400
Subject: Re: Salvo Missles vs. MT missiles
> <chuckle> Once again the fact that English is not my first language
makes
> itself felt. While I know what "acerbic" means, it isn't a word I
would've
> thought of on my own <g>
I suspect it isn't in the active vocabulary of most native English
speakers. It wouldn't have been in mine either, if not for Lois
Bujold.
> I have N = 1 to 9 at hand so can send that immediately
That's sufficient -- I picked 10 arbitrarily.
> Average values for 1 missile salvo faced by N = 0 to 9 PDSs (the "0"
line
> included for reference):
The IF Navy thanks you...