RE: (DS): Systems per Class
From: Brian B <greywanderer987@y...>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 09:41:36 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: RE: (DS): Systems per Class
The only systems Id violate the rule with would also
be apsw, infantry, gms, or class 1 direct fire
weapons.
--- owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
<johnmatkinson@yahoo.com> wrote:
> --- Brian B <greywanderer987@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > The list of real vehicles that break the rules
goes
> > on. (IIRC John A mentioned the ratel). Capacity
will
> > ensure that only small items violate the rule, so
a
> > hr
> > exempting such (again, cap. 4 seems good) makes
> > sense.
>
> I only ignore it for infantry teams and machine
guns,
> as those are the worst "Real Life" offenders.
>
> Ratel: 20mm cannon, 3 machineguns, 9 dismounts IIRC.
> Big, but not size 5.
>
> Armed scout or MP HMMWV: machinegun, dismount team.
>
> Any Israeli vehicle you care to name: Well more
> machineguns than they would be allowed.
>
> M-16 halftrack: 4xAPSW on a size 2 track.
>
> I don't really find a tactical reason to have
multiple
> heavy weapons on a single vehicle (excepting
> GMS/automatic weapon combos) anyway.
>
> John
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail is new and improved - Check it out!
> http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
=====
"In life, you must try and be the type of person that your dog thinks
you are."
- Anonymous
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Vote for the stars of Yahoo!'s next ad campaign!
http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/yahoo/votelifeengine/