Re: (DS): Systems per Class

i agree. My second point still stands.
--- owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
<warbeads@juno.com> wrote:
> 1) PDS counts.
> 2)PDS is specifically for auotmated anti-GMS work,
not manual infantry
> killing.
> 
> On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 15:25:59 -0700 (PDT) Brian B
> <greywanderer987@yahoo.com> writes:
> >1. Re-read the paragraph above the one that you
> >quoted, then tell me the pds doesnt count. 2. The
> >problem is with the rule in general, not with
> >hair-splitting about whether a specific system
> >violates it or not.
> >--- owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
> ><lerchey@andrew.cmu.edu> wrote:
> >> You can do the slammers combat car in DSII
without
> >breaking the rules as 
> >> they are written.	It explicitely states that the
> >"free" APSW does NOT 
> >> count towards any capacity or size limitations
> >issues (Page 11: ALL 
> >> MILITARY VEHICLES ARE FITTED WITH ONE "FREE"
APSW,
> >CAPABLE OF ALL-ROUND 
> >> FIRE; THIS WEAPON DOES NOT COUNT TOWARDS ANY
WEAPONS
> >FIT LIMITATIONS, OR 
> >> TAKE UP ANY CAPACITY.).  Thus, your combat car
(size
> >2) with 3 APSWs is 
> >> within the "2 weapons max" limit despite the
third
> >weapon.  Further, the 
> >> PDS is not listed as a "weapon" but rather as a
> >"defensive system".	E.G.,
> >> it doesn't count as a "weapon" because it can't
be
> >used to attack anything.
> >> 
> >> <shrug>
> >> 
> >> I don't see the problem.
> >> ;)
> >> 
> >> 
> >> J
> >> 
> >> 
> >> John K. Lerchey
> >> Computer and Network Security Coordinator
> >> Computing Services
> >> Carnegie Mellon University
> >> 
> >> 
> >> On Wed, 21 Jul 2004, Robertson, Brendan wrote:
> >> 
> >> > There are practical reasons for allowing more
> >SAW/PDS type weapons on the
> >> > designs; it lets you build a Slammers combat
car
> >for example (size 2, 3 x
> >> > SAW is DSII and size 2, 3 x PIG in SGII).
> >> > It also makes vehicles more effective in close
> >assault actions (as only
> >> > SAW/PDS weapons can fire in DSII close
assaults).
> >> >
> >> > Brendan
> >> > 'Neath Southern Skies
> >> >
> >> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> >> From: John K Lerchey
> >[mailto:lerchey@andrew.cmu.edu]
> >> >> Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 7:21 AM
> >> >>
> >> >> Hm.  I don't see how this is a "consensus"
issue,
> >unless my reading
> >> >> comprehension skills are suffering badly.  I
just
> >re-read the vehicle
> >> >> design rules.  It clearly states that you may
> >have one
> >> >> *weapon system* per
> >> >> size point of the vehicle.  It says nothing
about
> >limits on
> >> >> non-weapons
> >> >> other than the fact that they use capacity.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > IMPORTANT: Notice to be read with this E-mail
> >> > 1. Before opening any attachments, please check
> >them for
> >> > viruses and defects.
> >> >
> >> > 2. This e-mail (including any attachments) may
> >contain confidential
> >> > information for the use of the intended
recipient.
> >> >
> >> > 3. If you are not the intended recipient,
please:
> >contact the sender
> >> > by return e-mail, to notify the misdirection;
do
> >not copy, print,
> >> > re-transmit, store or act in reliance on this
> >e-mail; and delete and
> >> > destroy all copies of this e-mail.
> >> >
> >> > 4. Any views expressed in this e-mail are those
of
> >the sender and are
> >> > not a statement of Australian Government policy
> >unless otherwise stated.
> >> >
> >> > 5. Any electronic address published in this
> >message is not to be taken as a
> >> > conspicuous publication of that electronic
> >address.
> >> > The Department of Veterans' Affairs does not
> >consent to the receipt of
> >> > "commercial electronic messages" as that term
is
> >defined in the Spam Act
> >> > 2003.
> >> >
> >> > 6. If you do not wish to receive further emails
of
> >this type from the
> >> > Department of Veterans' Affairs, please forward
> >your reply to this message
> >> > to feedback@dva.gov.au with 'Unsubscribe' in
the
> >subject line.
> >> >
> >> > 7.  Finally, please do not remove this notice,
so
> >that any
> >> > other readers are aware of these restrictions.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >
> >
> >=====
> >"In life, you must try and be the type of person
that your dog thinks 
> >you are."
> >
> >- Anonymous
> >
> >
> >	
> >		
> >___________
=== Message Truncated === 

=====
"In life, you must try and be the type of person that your dog thinks
you are."

- Anonymous

		
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail