Prev: Re: Four years without thrust | Next: Re: Four years without thrust |
Samuel Penn wrote:
>No reason something similar couldn't be done with ECM pods
>as a form of stealth technology (stick down a salvo of ECM
>'bursts' which shield the ship from attacks).
>
>
How about an ECM mechanic somehow opposed by the target's fire control?
Allocate firecons to cracking it to partially or totally negate the
effects.
Prev: Re: Four years without thrust | Next: Re: Four years without thrust |