Prev: Re: Four years without thrust Next: Re: Four years without thrust

Re: Four years without thrust

From: Lachlan Atcliffe <u1m87@k...>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 13:06:12 +0100
Subject: Re: Four years without thrust

Samuel Penn wrote:

>No reason something similar couldn't be done with ECM pods
>as a form of stealth technology (stick down a salvo of ECM
>'bursts' which shield the ship from attacks).
>  
>

How about an ECM mechanic somehow opposed by the target's fire control? 
Allocate firecons to cracking it to partially or totally negate the
effects.

Prev: Re: Four years without thrust Next: Re: Four years without thrust