Re: I'm back
From: Ryan Gill <rmgill@m...>
Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2004 16:21:33 -0400
Subject: Re: I'm back
At 1:37 PM -0500 7/3/04, <warbeads@juno.com> wrote:
>I guess it depends if you see the future of "waterborne warfare" as
>Submariner's Fantasy ("Submarines and targets" School of projection) or
>whether detection improves to allow surface (unlikely) or
>airborne/spaceborne?? (possible) units to combat sub reasonably well.
Well, the Tuffleyverse has a description of large
battles fought over water with Hovercraftr and
GRAV vehicles. A grav platform seems ideal for
waterborne fights in that its fast and has a low
water disturbance profile for its speed.
I suspect a submarine would have a hard time with
a small force of fast tanks. But how would the
tanks deal with the sub? Homing torps once they
have a localized location? Sono-buoys seem the
ideal means of checking for the craft.
--
--
Ryan Gill rmgill@SPAMmindspring.com
----------------------------------------------------------
| | | -==----
| O--=- | | /_8[*]°_\
|_/|o|_\_| | _________ | /_[===]_\
/ 00DA61 \ |/---------\| __/ \---
_w/|=_[__]_= \w_ // [_] o[]\\ _oO_\ /_O|_
|: O(4) == O :| _Oo\=======/_O_ |____\ /____|
|---\________/---| [__O_______W__] |x||_\ /_||x|
|s|\ /|s| |s|/BSV 575\|s| |x|-\| |/-|x|
|s|=\______/=|s| |s|=|_____|=|s| |x|--|_____|--|x|
|s| |s| |s| |s| |x| |x|
'60 Daimler Ferret '42 Daimler Dingo '42 Humber MkIV (1/3)
----------------------------------------------------------