Prev: Re: TOE Next: Re: I'm back

Re: I'm back

From: Ryan Gill <rmgill@m...>
Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2004 16:21:33 -0400
Subject: Re: I'm back

At 1:37 PM -0500 7/3/04, <warbeads@juno.com> wrote:
>I guess it depends if you see the future of "waterborne warfare" as
>Submariner's Fantasy ("Submarines and targets" School of projection) or
>whether detection improves to allow surface (unlikely) or
>airborne/spaceborne?? (possible) units to combat sub reasonably well.

Well, the Tuffleyverse has a description of large 
battles fought over water with Hovercraftr and 
GRAV vehicles. A grav platform seems ideal for 
waterborne fights in that its fast and has a low 
water disturbance profile for its speed.

I suspect a submarine would have a hard time with 
a small force of fast tanks. But how would the 
tanks deal with the sub? Homing torps once they 
have a localized location? Sono-buoys seem the 
ideal means of checking for the craft.
-- 
--
Ryan Gill	       rmgill@SPAMmindspring.com
----------------------------------------------------------
      |        |		   |	     -==----	  
      | O--=-  |		   |	    /_8[*]°_\	   
      |_/|o|_\_|       | _________ |	    /_[===]_\	  
      / 00DA61 \       |/---------\|	 __/	     \--- 
   _w/|=_[__]_= \w_    // [_]  o[]\\   _oO_\	     /_O|_
  |: O(4) ==	O :|  _Oo\=======/_O_  |____\	    /____|
  |---\________/---|  [__O_______W__]	|x||_\	   /_||x| 
   |s|\        /|s|   |s|/BSV 575\|s|	|x|-\|	   |/-|x| 
   |s|=\______/=|s|   |s|=|_____|=|s|	|x|--|_____|--|x| 
   |s|		|s|   |s|	  |s|	|x|	      |x| 
'60 Daimler Ferret '42 Daimler Dingo '42 Humber MkIV (1/3)
----------------------------------------------------------

Prev: Re: TOE Next: Re: I'm back