RE: Graser beam observations
From: "Robertson, Brendan" <Brendan.Robertson@d...>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 12:57:08 +1100
Subject: RE: Graser beam observations
Using those figures (and ignoring the extra 6" of range) we can make
some
variable comparisons.
This is rough and doesn't take into account all the variables that OO
plugs
into his math.
Damage per mass (6-arc comparison):
B-1 (6 arc) Graser-1 (6 arc)
Pulsetorp (2 x 3-arc)
12 mu vs Screen 0 0.8015 0.6987 0.3889
12 mu vs Screen 1 0.6362 0.5525 0.3889
12 mu vs Screen 2 0.4679 0.4083 0.3889
Damage per mass (1-arc comparison):
B-3 (1 arc) Graser-2 (1 arc)
Pulsetorp (1-arc)
06 mu vs Screen 0 0.6011 0.6213 0.7292
12 mu vs Screen 0 0.6011 0.6213 0.5833
18 mu vs Screen 0 0.4008 0.6213 0.4375
24 mu vs Screen 0 0.4008 0.3107 0.2917
30 mu vs Screen 0 0.2004 0.3107 0.1458
36 mu vs Screen 0 0.2004 0.3107 n/a
06 mu vs Screen 1 0.4771 0.4911 0.7292
12 mu vs Screen 1 0.4771 0.4911 0.5833
18 mu vs Screen 1 0.3181 0.4911 0.4375
24 mu vs Screen 1 0.3181 0.2455 0.2917
30 mu vs Screen 1 0.1591 0.2455 0.1458
36 ms vs Screen 1 0.1591 0.2455 n/a
06 mu vs Screen 2 0.3509 0.3629 0.7292
12 mu vs Screen 2 0.3509 0.3629 0.5833
18 mu vs Screen 2 0.2340 0.3629 0.4375
24 mu vs Screen 2 0.2340 0.1815 0.2917
30 mu vs Screen 2 0.1170 0.1815 0.1458
36 mu vs Screen 2 0.1170 0.1815 n/a
Brendan
'Neath Southern
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jon Davis [SMTP:davisje@nycap.rr.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 11:57 AM
>
> Beam 1 vs. Screen-0 Graser 1 vs. Screen-0
> Average = 0.801545 Average = 2.79584
> Max = 14 Max = 56
>
> Beam 1 vs. Screen-1 Graser 1 vs. Screen-1
> Average = 0.63616 Average = 2.209875
> Max = 12 Max = 54
>
> Beam 1 vs. Screen-2 Graser 1 vs. Screen-2
> Average = 0.467905 Average = 1.633
> Max = 12 Max = 47
>
>
> Mass 1 - All arcs Mass 2 - Single arc
>
>
> Jon
>
> --
> ***** Scanned by Anti-Spam Sheriff *****
>
>
>
IMPORTANT: Notice to be read with this E-mail
1. Before opening any attachments, please check them for
viruses and defects. 2. This e-mail (including any
attachments) may contain confidential information for the
use of the intended recipient. 3. If you are not the
intended recipient, please: contact the sender by return
e-mail, to notify the misdirection; do not copy, print,
re-transmit, store or act in reliance on this e-mail; and
delete and destroy all copies of this e-mail. 4. Any views
expressed in this e-mail are those of the sender and are not
a statement of Australian Government policy unless otherwise stated.
5. Finally, please do not remove this notice, so that any
other readers are aware of these restrictions.