Re: FT fire arcs

OO gave the official answer I believe.

Not if you house rule it... but as noted a 'dip and a jerk' (not shown
at
scale) should unmask just about any blockage that was not over arching
too.  I can't think of any starship models with a item that masked in
that manner... again, at our scale (undefined) and with just about any
decent to good PSB it shouldn't be a problem in 3D environment.

On Mon, 15 Mar 2004 00:10:40 -0500 "Noah V. Doyle"
<nvdoyle@insightbb.com> writes:
>--=======62DA31C9=======
>Content-Type: text/plain; x-avg-checked=avg-ok-2BFDF65; 
>charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>
>Must multiple fire arcs of a weapon mount be contiguous? Non-connected 
>fire 
>arcs could be used to represent weapons that while 'turreted', can 
>only 
>pitch to point fore or aft (as opposed to pitch and yaw) - or could 
>simulate certain arcs of fire being masked by the construction of the 
>ship 
>itself.
>
>Noah
>
>--=======62DA31C9=======
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-avg=cert; 
>x-avg-checked=avg-ok-2BFDF65
>Content-Disposition: inline
>
>
>---
>Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
>Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
>Version: 6.0.620 / Virus Database: 398 - Release Date: 3/10/2004
>
>--=======62DA31C9=======--
>
>

________________________________________________________________
The best thing to hit the Internet in years - Juno SpeedBand!
Surf the Web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER!
Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today!