Prev: Re: Missiles was Re: UNSC beta and FB3 Next: Re: Grasers was Re: UNSC beta and FB3

Re: UNSC beta and FB3

From: John Leary <john_t_leary@y...>
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 22:33:01 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: UNSC beta and FB3


--- Roger Burton West <roger@firedrake.org> wrote:
> http://lists.firedrake.org/gzg/200403/msg00192.html.
> In short, yes; if
> you only _have_ 3 or fewer hull rows because you
> don't have enough boxes
> to put one in the others, you ought to pay for it.

     Reguarding boxes and hull row equality -
This is an unfortunite choice (Paying for 'unused'
hull rows), as it will drive the game to larger
ships.	 This has been a problem in the past and 
may come back to 'chew' ones 'thoughfulness' once
again.

Bye for now,
John L.

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam
http://mail.yahoo.com

Prev: Re: Missiles was Re: UNSC beta and FB3 Next: Re: Grasers was Re: UNSC beta and FB3