Prev: Re: Rant Warning below Re: UNSC beta and FB3 Next: Re: Rant Warning below

Re: Rant Warning below

From: Michael Llaneza <maserati@e...>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 06:36:21 -0800
Subject: Re: Rant Warning below

I've always assumed that the Omega class "Destroyer" was named in the 
same spirit as the British light carriers were called "through-deck 
cruisers" to get the naval estimates through parliament.

Roger Burton West wrote:

>On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 08:08:46AM -0600, Doug Evans wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Natch, in B5, where the largest ship the
>>humans have is a 'destroyer', it's obvious, you can get away with
fudge.
>>    
>>
>
>My understanding is that Straczynski and Ellison intended to use naval 
>terms, but didn't actually know them well enough to use them correctly 
>and didn't bother to hire an advisor.
>
>Roger
>
>
>  
>

-- 
We choose to go to the moon. We choose to go to the moon in this decade
and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are
hard, because that goal will serve to organize and measure the best of
our energies and skills, because that challenge is one that we are
willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one which we
intend to win, and the others, too.

http://www.cs.umb.edu/jfklibrary/j091262.htm

Prev: Re: Rant Warning below Re: UNSC beta and FB3 Next: Re: Rant Warning below