Re: CPV?
From: Jared Hilal <jlhilal@y...>
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 11:47:35 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: CPV?
--- Oerjan Ohlson <oerjan.ohlson@telia.com> wrote:
> The "full" version treats carriers, freighters etc. differently,
So I can assume (or hope) that a TMF 200 bulk cargo freighter will no
longer have the same value as a FB battlecruiser?
One other thing (if it's already taken care of then just ig nore this);
on 28 Jan 2004, Laserlight wrote:
"Matt [Tope] said:
>Think I will steal the Hattin outright, (well, I'll drop 2 pds and 2
>points of armour to bring the hull up to 26,
I think you'll find the armor is more valuable than the extra hull."
in
http://lists.firedrake.org/gzg/200401/msg00373.html
If he is correct (and I can see that he is), then shouldn't armor cost
more points than hull integrity, and they are currently the same?
J