Prev: Re: SGII And Points Next: Re: SGII And Points

Re: SGII And Points

From: <warbeads@j...>
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 22:15:47 -0600
Subject: Re: SGII And Points

On Sat, 28 Feb 2004 18:40:26 -0600 "Mark A. Siefert"
<siefertma@wi.rr.com> writes:
<snip>
>I offered that there were a couple very balanced fan created points 
>systems
>available on the web.	That didn't sway them either.  "Tuffley made a
>mistake by not adding a point system, he'll never compete with GW by 
>doing
>that."
>
>Comments?
>

I don't understand why they think anybody would care to bother about
competing with Gross Wannabe-Wargames!

Never found a figure I would buy at retail from them, never found a set
of rules they produced that didn't make like limburger gone bad, and
never much cared for their 'Play our Rules OUR way ONLY' attitude.  And
that _is_ my balanced, rational opinion.  You should see my tirade mode.

Or maybe not, it's not even a little less then rabid...

In [gag, choke, gasp] defense of some of the reportedly better aspects
of
the company's efforts, I have not seen Epic or Rogue Trader rules which
some people, who are superficially sane at least, report as good
products.  And I have collected a few fantasy human figures in grab bags
that were identified as possibly 'early' GW figures that were fairly
reasonable.

Makes me think I might have a little idea how the Aussies think about
some of the American military leadership/mindset when we get into the
"We
invented [fill in the blank]" mode.

Gracias,
Glenn

________________________________________________________________
The best thing to hit the Internet in years - Juno SpeedBand!
Surf the Web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER!
Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today!

Prev: Re: SGII And Points Next: Re: SGII And Points