Re: [DS] APSW's

--- Oerjan Ohlson <oerjan.ohlson@telia.com> wrote:
 
> This makes it less effective as an anti-infantry
> weapon than an APSW/L in 
> most situations (2 chits at Red validity out to 12",
> vs. 3 chits at varying 
> validities out to the same range) - the APSW/H has a
> very slight edge 
> against dug-in troops, but the /L is better against
> troops in soft cover as 
> well as in the open.

Yeah, I picked up on that too late to retract my
comments.  Still, it gives me a starting point of
reference....


=====
"In life, you must try and be the type of person that your dog thinks
you are."

- Anonymous

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing.
http://photos.yahoo.com/