Re: Headgear

I thought he was just being specific about applying a universal truth
(that you stated.)

On Sat, 29 Nov 2003 11:28:03 -0500 Randall Joiner
<rljoiner@mindspring.com> writes:
>
>>
>>Somehow, I have a hard time thinking somebody you call a 
>Congress-"Critter"
>>would be a trustworthy witness. And numbers don't help much. Are 100
>>"Critters" better than 1 "Critter" ?
>
>
>You have to ask?  I'd say a hundred critters is a target rich 
>enviroment.  (Load'em up boys!  We're on a "BUG HUNT!")
>
>But I think bug, as in congress-roach is more appropriate.  In which 
>case, 
>the few the better.
>
>
>>Of course, that the "Critter" Ed Schrock is a Republican (and thus 
>likely to
>>support the US government), has nothing to do with his assessment of 
>the
>>situation in Iraq.
>
>Now now, that's rather one sided cynicism.  Are you trying to imply 
>that 
>Democrats wouldn't circle the wagons either?  Come now, I'm all for 
>cynically expecting politicians to do what's best for them, but be 
>universal in your sarcasm.
>
>Rand.
>
>

________________________________________________________________
The best thing to hit the internet in years - Juno SpeedBand!
Surf the web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER!
Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today!