Re: [SG2] weapons

> Would you guys (Imbre and John) at least work out a framework of
common
> reference?

I understand John quit well.  He and Dawgface are too busy trying to
poke
fun, make of me to bother.

> It seems like Imre is talking about protracted, guerilla-type
conflicts
(which
> low-tech forces are wont to fight), while John keeps mentioning
advantages
or
> concerns that exist only when a high-tech force engages a low-tech in
a
> stand-up fight.

Actually, the proper role of a low tech force is to go guerilla whenever
a
high tech force is arround and go more or less conventional when the
high
tech force leaves to try to force it to comeback.  The intent is to tie
down
the high tech forces so they can't be used else where (invade the next
planet, etc.) and prevent the enemy from economically exploiting the
planet.

ias