RE: [SG/DS] Orbital assault was RE: Troop Quality was RE: [SG2] weapons
From: Brian B <greywanderer987@y...>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 16:22:28 -0800 (PST)
Subject: RE: [SG/DS] Orbital assault was RE: Troop Quality was RE: [SG2] weapons
--- Beth.Fulton@csiro.au wrote:
> G'day,
> Bombardment from orbit doesn't necessarily leave you
> with a nuclear waste ground. If you're from a
> different species (I was thinking KV strike on
> humans) or you want the real estate and don't care
> about the exact state of the fauna or flora then the
> "drop large rock etc" option is viable. Ecosystems
> continue after such catastrophes, just not
> necessarily in a state where all previous community
> members can participate... but if that is the goal
> of the exercise in the first place...
True enough. However, the original discussion never
mentioned other species, so it seems reasonable for
Adrian & John not to have accounted for that frame of
reference in their responses.
This brings home just how important it is to define
terms and parameters for a discussion, to avoid
confusion and to provide participants with the ability
to weigh all relevant information.
=====
"Teach a man to make fire, and he will be warm for a day. Set a man on
fire, and he will be warm for the rest of his life." -- John A.
Hrastar
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now
http://companion.yahoo.com/