Re: [SG/DS] Orbital assault was RE: Troop Quality was RE: [SG2] weapons
From: Ryan M Gill <rmgill@m...>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 10:18:30 -0500
Subject: Re: [SG/DS] Orbital assault was RE: Troop Quality was RE: [SG2] weapons
At 9:56 AM -0500 11/25/03, Imre A. Szabo wrote:
>
>Why land at the polar ice cap or similar remote place? If the troops
are in
>dropships, you can enter the low atmosphere (within 10,000 feet of the
>surface) of the planet wherever you want, and then fly towards the
targets
>you want to take out and land a reasonable safe distance away. This
can be
>rather close if you use a NOE flight profile for the last part.
Obviously,
>drop pods can't do this. But if the troops in the dropships eliminate
the
>defenses that can take out then drop pods, then drop pods can be used
to
>reinforce.
Hmm, THAAD near those holes in the network. Good way to loose those
landers on the way in. How much fuel do they have for a long flight
and return to orbit?
--
--
----------------------------------------------------------------
- Ryan Montieth Gill '01 Honda Insight -
- rmgill@SPAmindspring.com '85 CB700S -
- ryan.gill@SPAMturner.com '76 Chevy Monte Carlo -
- www.mindspring.com/~rmgill '72 Honda CB750 -
- '60 Daimler FV701H Mk2/3 -
- '42 Daimler Scout Car Mk II -
- I speak not for CNN, nor they for me -
----------------------------------------------------------------
- The director of Home Security encourages you to -
- turn in your neighbor & spy on your friends. -
----------------------------------------------------------------
- C&R-FFL / Protect your electronic rights! \ EFF-ACLU -
- SAF & NRA/ Join the EFF! http://www.eff.org/ \ DoD #0780 -
----------------------------------------------------------------