Prev: Re: Ship Class Nomenclature Next: RE: Ship Class Nomenclature

RE: Ship Class Nomenclature

From: "B Lin" <lin@r...>
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 17:23:32 -0600
Subject: RE: Ship Class Nomenclature

Perhaps not.  There really should be a "Box" class freighter for the
cheaper wares.	"Port" might be nomenclature reserved for "heavy or
fortified" versions of classes.  "Cognac" might be used for "distilled"
classes that pack more "punch" than their size would normally indicate.

Also just think of the jibes if you lose to such a fleet: "You were
thrashed by a Dom Perignon '69 and a Magnum of Cabernet"

It also leads to a new type of game with higher stakes - instead of
ships, you play with actual (full)wine bottles - kills are claimed as
victory spoils.

--Binhan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ryan M Gill [mailto:rmgill@mindspring.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 5:19 PM
> To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
> Subject: Re: Ship Class Nomenclature
> 
> 
> At 4:58 PM -0600 8/4/03, B Lin wrote:
> >Reading Schott's Original Miscellany, I came across Wine Bottle 
> >Sizes, and thought that they would make a good series for naming 
> >classes, they are from smallest to largest:
> 
> I take it these crews would spend most of their time in port (harhar) 
> either squishing grapes or standing around in snooty bars eating 
> cheese?
> -- 
>   Ryan Gill		   rmgill@SPAMmindspring.com
> ---------------------------------------------------------- 
>	|	 |		    |	       -==----	      
>	| O--=-  |	  |	    |	      /_8[*]°_\       
>	|_/|o|_\_|	  |_________|	    __/_[===]_\       
>	/ 00DA61 \	  /---------\	   | /	       \---   
>    _w/|=_[__]_= \w_	 // [_]  o[]\\	 __|O\	       /O_|_  
>   |: O(4) ==	  O :|	_Oo\=======/_O_  |_41_\       /____|  
>   |---\________/---|	[__41____(&)__]   |/||_\     /_||/|   
>    |/|\	 /|/|	|/|/F 48582\|/|   |/|-\|     |/-|/|   
>    |/|=\______/=|/|	|/|=|_____|=|/|   |/|--|_____|--|/|   
>    |/|	  |/|	|/|	    |/|   |/|		|/|   
>   '60 Daimler Ferret '42 Daimler Dingo '43 Humber MkIV (1/2)
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 

Prev: Re: Ship Class Nomenclature Next: RE: Ship Class Nomenclature