Re: [SG,DS] Power Armour Weapon
From: Ryan M Gill <rmgill@m...>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 12:50:39 -0500
Subject: Re: [SG,DS] Power Armour Weapon
At 5:56 PM +0100 3/11/03, KH.Ranitzsch@t-online.de wrote:
>
>Err, this is a summary of the whole campaign from late 1943 to 1945,
right ?
>
>Not exactly of relevance to squad-level actions and the way HMGs should
be
>cooled.
I'd be willing to wager a fiver that the MG42's barrel and ammo
consumption rate as well as the retention of the Vickers in British
and Canadian units in the Korean war made a difference in both
conflicts. Not something easy to prove either way however.
--
--
----------------------------------------------------------------
- Ryan Montieth Gill '01 Honda Insight -
- rmgill@SPAmindspring.com '85 CB700S -
- ryan.gill@SPAMturner.com '76 Chevy Monte Carlo -
- www.mindspring.com/~rmgill '72 Honda CB750 -
- '60 Daimler FV701H Mk2/3 -
- '42 Daimler Scout Car Mk II -
- I speak not for CNN, nor they for me -
----------------------------------------------------------------
- The director of Home Security encourages you to -
- turn in your neighbor & spy on your friends. -
----------------------------------------------------------------
- C&R-FFL / Protect your electronic rights! \ EFF-ACLU -
- SAF & NRA/ Join the EFF! http://www.eff.org/ \ DoD #0780 -
----------------------------------------------------------------