RE: Tom's life on the lamb *

Maybe the "details" of this non-event should be published somewhere. 
Just so 
that it does not happen again, not that it ever happened in the first
place.

Michael Brown

-----Original Message-----
From:	laserlight@quixnet.net
Sent:	Thursday, February 27, 2003 9:21 AM
To:	gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Subject:	RE: Tom's life on the lamb *

[Tomb] Hey, I'm not the one that tried to
tempt Lady Eliza's virtue with savory bon-
bons! (Mr. Hudak, head for the hills....).

Do "Joe Louis" count as "savory bon bons"?

>I claim absolute innocence. We all had fun,
no one got hurt (yet)

Aside from psychological damage, that is.

>Besides, casting Jon of Needham as a
defrocked Anglican minister, had there
been such a game, would probably have
been equally scandalous.

That's right.  So it's a good thing he would have been an Appalachian
Southern Baptist preacher, instead, as that would have been *more*
scandalous--the effect we were looking for.  "Place yoah hand on the
afflicted part of yoah, ah, the afflicted splatter where his head used
to
be, now be HEALED hallelujah!"	JohnC would have looked a little shocky
around that point--he'd have prayed for deliverance and gotten a banjo
chorus and St Jon in quick succession.

>Of course, had anything actually happened,
I'm sure commitment would be the result
for all participants.

...And if not, we'll try again next year! "Frenzied Maniacs And Sheep",
anyone?

By the way...exactly how did we "win" the Cheesiest Game award *before*
the
game happened?

--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .