Prev: [DSIII] was RE: [OFFICIAL-COMMERCIAL] More Slammers figs out! Next: RE: [DSIII]

RE: [DSIII] was RE: [OFFICIAL-COMMERCIAL] More Slammers figs out !

From: "Bradley, Jason (US - Minneapolis)" <jabradley@D...>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 08:00:53 -0800
Subject: RE: [DSIII] was RE: [OFFICIAL-COMMERCIAL] More Slammers figs out !

I wouldn't mind seeing a new release of the rules.  I think they are
pretty
good as they are really but still...

Jason

-----Original Message-----
From: devans@nebraska.edu [mailto:devans@nebraska.edu] 
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 9:44 AM
To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Subject: [DSIII] was RE: [OFFICIAL-COMMERCIAL] More Slammers figs out!

>While the Slammer books are some personal favorites IMO the armored
combat
>would be more appropriate to DSII (Can I ask for a DS III?).

My impression is that bucks/guineas driving a business as it does, FT
probably wags the dog, and we got fleet books while Bugs Don't Surf got
pushed back again, and again. However, there's plenty of discussion
about
SG; I haven't seen near as much on DS.

So, Bill, put your ideas where your mouth is:
How would you change DS?

The_Beast

PS You left too quickly after your visit; I'd printed out a memento of
your
talk with James. I'll leave it at the shop.

This message (including any attachments) contains confidential
information
intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law.
 If
you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message.  Any
disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of
any
action based on it, is strictly prohibited.

Prev: [DSIII] was RE: [OFFICIAL-COMMERCIAL] More Slammers figs out! Next: RE: [DSIII]