Prev: RE: [SG] Shotguns Next: RE: [SG] Shotguns

RE: [SG] Shotguns

From: Ryan M Gill <rmgill@m...>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 12:47:19 -0500
Subject: RE: [SG] Shotguns

At 9:17 AM -0800 2/14/03, Brian Bilderback wrote:
>Given the need for greater penetration against it, and
>the subsequent increase in the likelihood of
>overpenetration and the resulting friendly fire
>problem, I can imagine that CQP against PA is
>something that most future troops will fear even more
>than now.

Assualting a position held by power armor would have to be a task 
very much hated unless you could gain a maneuverability or sensor 
edge. One would expect that the power armor's increased sensor 
capability and communications, would make the task of getting shots 
against them a challenge, let alone penetrating shots when in very 
close terrain with obscured vision and increased noise.
-- 
--
----------------------------------------------------------------
- Ryan Montieth Gill			     '01 Honda Insight -
- rmgill@SPAmindspring.com			    '85 CB700S -
- ryan.gill@SPAMturner.com		 '76 Chevy Monte Carlo -
- www.mindspring.com/~rmgill		       '72 Honda CB750 -
-				      '60 Daimler FV701H Mk2/3 -
-				   '42 Daimler Scout Car Mk II -
-	      I speak not for CNN, nor they for me	       -
----------------------------------------------------------------
-	 The director of Home Security encourages you to       - 
-	   turn in your neighbor & spy on your friends.        -
----------------------------------------------------------------
-  C&R-FFL  /  Protect your electronic rights!	  \ EFF-ACLU   -
- SAF & NRA/  Join the EFF!  http://www.eff.org/   \ DoD #0780 -	

----------------------------------------------------------------

Prev: RE: [SG] Shotguns Next: RE: [SG] Shotguns