Re: [GZG-OLC] February Update
From: Oerjan Ohlson <oerjan.ohlson@t...>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 21:38:17 +0100
Subject: Re: [GZG-OLC] February Update
Alan Brain wrote:
> >The two
> >ships in the photo are the first new additions to the Federal Stats
Europa
> >and Kra'Vak forces, and are also the first to be sculpted for us by
Oerjan
> >Ohlsson
Dunno who that is - it's not my family name <g>
(I and my SO have *almost* the same family name - mine is "Ohlson", hers
is
"Olsson" - so we're always bickering about which of us it is who spells
it
incorrectly... so of course I can't admit to being called "Ohlsson"!
<G>)
> >- we think you'll agree he's done a superb job of following the
> >style of the original FSE and KV ship designs while creating some
> >excellent new miniatures.
>
>You think rightly.
Thanks for the compliment :-)
> > FT 425 Kra'Vak TO'KI class Destroyer (pack of 2) £2.50
> > FT 625 FSE HYDRA class Destroyer (pack of 2) £2.50
> >
> > [PHOTO]
> > left to right: FT425, FT625
>
>OK Oerjan, how did you do it?
Same way as Schoon did the FSE Requin, Jon did the new FT ranges and
Tony
Francis at Brigade Models does the various SemFed ships: by glueing
styrene
bits of appropriate shapes together, making sure that there are no
cavities
inside the model ('cuz if there are, it'll cave in during the
mould-making). Railway modelling shops have a lot of styrene strips,
tubes
etc. in all kinds of interesting shapes which provides nice raw
materials,
and so do plastic sprues from model kits (eg. the Hydra hull structure
was
built from parts of a GW plastic sprue). A sharp knife, razor saw and
mitre, and a file or sanding paper did the rest of the shaping.
Sounds easy? It really is! (...though a bit time-consuming to put all
the
small details on - if Paul Copeland used this same technique to create
the
original FT ranges, I'm frankly amazed that he had the patience to do
all
the tiny panels everywhere...)
Well, at least the modelling is easy as long as I stick to straight
edges;
I'm still trying to figure out how to do decent-looking large curved or
double-curved surfaces like the nose of a Komarov or an NAC bridge
section
<g> I guess there might be a reason why Brigade Models have so few
SemFed
ship designs with large curved surfaces ;-)
The hardest part was to come up with the ideas for the basic hull shapes
-
similar enough to the older models to fit in well in the existing ranges
yet different enough to be distinct new models. The Hydra and To'Ki
("Seeker Spear") were both originally created to represent ship designs
I've used enough in my own games to want dedicated models for (in these
cases evolved variants of Rob Hofrichter's Epée and Tur'Kee designs
respectively, so he gets part of the credit for these models and is
really
to blame for me getting into modelling in the first place :-) ) Most of
the
other models I'm working on or planning now have similar backgrounds,
being
inspired by designs I've used and liked, both my own and ones I've
picked
up from others.
(The "and liked" bit is important - while I have used NAC fleets a fair
bit, particularly during playtest games, I like neither their visually
appearance nor their game stats very much - so don't expect to see any
new
NAC models from me!)
>Don't spose you'd care to flesh out the OU range a bit?
Not anytime soon, I'm afraid - mainly because I don't have any good
ideas
for new OU ships at the moment (at least ones which don't just look
exactly
like the existing models scaled up to BC/BB/DN size...), while I do have
ideas for a fair number of other ships I want to build first and not
very
much time in which to build them! (I'll also need to ask Eureka for
permission, but I don't think that'll be any problem.) Will keep it in
mind, but I won't promise anything.
Later,
Oerjan
oerjan.ohlson@telia.com
"Life is like a sewer.
What you get out of it, depends on what you put into it."
-Hen3ry