Prev: Re: Striker (was:Thought on Orbital Bombardment...) Next: Re: DS: Walkers

Re: Battletech-to-DS Size Classes, was Walkers

From: Symon Cook <Symon@e...>
Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 14:29:02 +0000
Subject: Re: Battletech-to-DS Size Classes, was Walkers

In article <20030207173958.28418.qmail@web20305.mail.yahoo.com>, Brian
Bilderback <greywanderer987@yahoo.com> writes
>
>That never felt quite right to me, considering the
>range of size classes in DS and the vehicle and mech
>tonnages available in BT (5-200 tons for vehicles,
>20-100 tons for mechs).  So I kind of worked out a
>slightly more nebulous ratio:
>
>Class 1-2:  Very Light Vehicles (5-20 tons, Protomechs
>would fall in this category)
>Class 3: Light Vehicles & Mechs (20-35 tons)
>Class 4: Medium Vehicles & Mechs (40-55 tons)
>Class 5: Heavy Vehicles & Mechs (60-75 tons)

Not unreasonable

>Class 6: Assault Vehicles & Mechs (80-100 tons)
>Class 7: Oversized Assault Vehicles (105-200 Tons)

Not so sure about this. Doubling mass from 100 to 200 tons ought to add
a bit more than 5 Capacity. I'd say you need a Size 8 to accommodate the
200 tonners.
Cheers
-- 
Symon Cook (founder member of Camros)(The Campaign for Real Operating
Systems).
.....
"You fertility deities are worse than Marxists," he said. "You think
that's all 
that goes on between people."

Roger Zelazny, Lord of Light. 1971.

Prev: Re: Striker (was:Thought on Orbital Bombardment...) Next: Re: DS: Walkers