Prev: Re: (fwd) Re: [FT] F***ters [was: Operational game] Next: Re: (fwd) Re: [FT] F***ters [was: Operational game]

Re: (fwd) Re: [FT] F***ters [was: Operational game]

From: Hugh Fisher <laranzu@o...>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 21:30:25 +1100
Subject: Re: (fwd) Re: [FT] F***ters [was: Operational game]


>Hopefully not the chart and/or the PDS percentage of mass schemes.  I'd
>rather just have a lower mass ADFC (mass 1) and more escort varients
that
>give a few weapons for ADFC and more PDS.  Or the second PDS phase.
>

 OK, I'm new to Full Thrust so am probably sticking foot in
 mouth here...

 Is increasing the cost of each fighter not an option? Seems
 a lot easier than coming up with new weapon rules or even
 reprinting the fleet books.

 Is it really that painful to exchange 2 mass of other gear
 for an ADFC on capital ships instead of relying on specialised
 escort vessels?

 (I'm just bitter because my fighter-heavy NACs just got thumped
 at a convention, so don't want them made less effective :-) )

	Hugh

Prev: Re: (fwd) Re: [FT] F***ters [was: Operational game] Next: Re: (fwd) Re: [FT] F***ters [was: Operational game]