Re: [OT] Columbia

On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, Dances With Rocks wrote:

> 
> On Mon, 3 Feb 2003 devans@nebraska.edu wrote:
> 
> >
> > ***
> > I'd have to argue the "purely as an asthetic project" bit.
> > ***
> >
> > He'll have to speak for hisself, but I think it was not artsy only
value he
> > was arguing, but the artistic beauty produced is SUFFICIENT
justification.
> > Everything else is gravy. ;->=
> >
> > If that his intent, I certainly understand what he's saying!
> 
> My apologies, Brian. I misunderstood what you were saying.

No problem; Beast got my meaning exactly. I know Hubble has produced
scienctific & non-visual advances just as stunning as the images we all
know, but those images are pretty much enough!

I'd bet that everyone on this list has, at one time or another, had a
Hubble/NASA image as desktop wallpaper on their computers... (OK, not a
top quality justification for a space program, but nevertheless... :-> )

Brian.