Re: [FT] F***ters [was: Operational game]
From: Oerjan Ohlson <oerjan.ohlson@t...>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 23:34:10 +0100
Subject: Re: [FT] F***ters [was: Operational game]
Imre Szabo wrote:
> >The whole fighter balance issue is a tough one. For one thing, you
have to
> >take _all_ the fleets into consideration, including the Phalons with
their
> >PBLs. I suspect that by the time Nathan has played enough playtest
games to
> >find the problems and sort them out, the playtest lists' proposal
will
> be out
> >in one form or another...
>
>The problem is that you allow integrated fighter attacks (...) without
>integrated anti-fighter defenses.
Um... Mr. Szabo?
Your above statement is certainly correct for the *currently published*
rules.
Allan was, however, talking about the playtest list's proposal for
solving
the fighter balance problems you describe - which makes your statement
quite inaccurate indeed...
Kind regards,
Oerjan
oerjan.ohlson@telia.com
"Life is like a sewer.
What you get out of it, depends on what you put into it."
-Hen3ry