Re: [DSII] Dozy question re: Command/Communications

In article <20021205053037.20930.qmail@web12305.mail.yahoo.com>, John
Atkinson <johnmatkinson@yahoo.com> writes
>
>Ah, but the standard DSII assumption set is that the
>commander is off somewhere safe and that his only
>contact is through communications.  Personal
>leadership above the platoon level is non-existant.

It is? How come we have:

Loss of Command Unit (Page 24).

Then?

> 
>If you insist on designating company and batallion
>commanders, you have to houserule.  In which case, the
>above suggestion is quite viable.
>

One of the things I'm currently working up. I wanted to start from the
definitive rules on Commanders and C/C Systems, which is proving hard.

Cheers
-- 
Symon Cook (founder member of Camros)(The Campaign for Real Operating
Systems).
.....
"You fertility deities are worse than Marxists," he said. "You think
that's all 
that goes on between people."

Roger Zelazny, Lord of Light. 1971.