Prev: Re: Points balance on K-guns vs Beams Next: Re: [DSII] Dozy question re: Command/Communications

Re: [DSII] Dozy question re: Command/Communications

From: Symon Cook <Symon@e...>
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 13:22:35 +0000
Subject: Re: [DSII] Dozy question re: Command/Communications

In article <5.1.0.14.1.20021204001841.0379dec0@m1.853.telia.com>, Oerjan
Ohlson <oerjan.ohlson@telia.com> writes
>Symon Cook wrote:
>
>>Maybe I'm being dense or something but what are the rules concerning
>>Command/Communications systems? [snip]
>>
>>I am being blind or stupid?
>
>You decide for yourself <g> But read the "Loss of Command Unit" rule on

>p.24 first - particularly the very last sentence.
>

Fair enough. In fact we've always kind of assumed this. My point is that
the rules are NOT clear by any stretch of the imagination. (Oh the
arguments). For example:

How big does you on table force need to be before it needs a C/C System?
What if it doesn't have one.

How big can an on table force get before it needs more than one C/C
system? What happens if it loses one?

Does a Platoon commander need one? A company Commander? A Brigade?

The reason I ask is I'm trying to firm up these rules, and maybe tie it
in into calling Ortillery/Air stikes/Artillery.
Cheers
-- 
Symon Cook (founder member of Camros)(The Campaign for Real Operating
Systems).
.....
"You fertility deities are worse than Marxists," he said. "You think
that's all 
that goes on between people."

Roger Zelazny, Lord of Light. 1971.

Prev: Re: Points balance on K-guns vs Beams Next: Re: [DSII] Dozy question re: Command/Communications