Re: Mixed combat units, etc.
From:
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 00:23:28 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: Mixed combat units, etc.
As for the scanfed, my army unit was mixed, my present
one is not, but thats only from the lack of
applicants... :)
As for camo, we use IR blocking camo netting already,
developed by Barracuda Technologies already, but the
cheapest way is to apply wet branches of a tree that I
don't know the english name for. It completely blocks
IR signature if you put it on in a layer of about 40cm
thickness.
If we can do that today, what can we do in 200
years.... :)
--- "K.H.Ranitzsch" <KH.Ranitzsch@t-online.de> wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <kaladorn@magma.ca>
>
> > Mixed Units:
> >
> > I can see the following allowing/using mixed
> units:
>
> > FCT (that's the F in Free)
>
> Hmm... Probably the Californian units, but the
> Texans ?
>
> > I can see the following not allowing/using mixed
> units:
> > IF
> > LLAR
>
> My take, too, at least for the regular units.
> Mercenaries and militas may be
> different, though (see some recent guerilla forces)
>
> > PAU
>
> There are female PAU figures. For historical
> precedent, see the Dahomey
> Amazons.
>
> > Don't have any idea for:
> > Swiss
> > KNG (Dutch)
> > OUDF
> > ScanFed
>
> I guess these would have female and or mixed units -
> a development from
> present attitudes.
>
> Greetings
> Karl Heinz
>
>
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Y! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your web site
http://webhosting.yahoo.com/