Re: [SG2] detached element questions
From: John Atkinson <johnmatkinson@y...>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 20:34:41 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [SG2] detached element questions
--- Yves Lefebvre <ivanohe@abacom.com> wrote:
> Medic in the command squad 24inch away. Is it
> possible to form a detached
> element of one man and the casuality to go to the
> medic? If so, what happen
Yes.
> if the casuality get a wounded (stabilised) result?
> Can the wounded be
> transfer to the command squad and the lone trooper
> go toward his original
> squad?
Yes.
> Also, we tried an orbital insertion of a PA squad.
> However, there was a
> lots of bad roll and some troopers were 36" away of
> some other! Also, there
> was 2 ennemy squad in-between. According to the
> rules, the first few
> actions of the PA will have to be reorganise to move
> in integrety distance.
> There is no mention of movement in reorganise, but I
> assume that each
> trooper can move it's base mobility value in order
> to reform the squad.
Yes.
> But in our case, reforming the squad means to move
> between 2 ennemy squads.
> We decide to regroup in 2 parts, one of the part
> beeing a detached element.
Makes sense.
> I think it was the more logical way to handle the
> situation. We rule that
> the main squad will be able to act normally (ie:
> fire), but the detached
> element will only be able to try to get back in the
> main squad. Does is
> make sense?
No. Airborne guys are remarkably flexible. They are
treated like a normal detachment. IMNSHO.
> terminated yet. It migth take some weeks until we
> finish it since I will be
> very busy in the next couple of week! And far away
I should hope so! And not with putting SG games on
the web. That's grounds for divorce. Or annulment,
actually. :)
John
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! News - Today's headlines
http://news.yahoo.com