Prev: Re: New 'electrical active' Armour to defeat hand held anti-tank rounds Next: Re: New 'electrical active' Armour to defeat hand held anti-tankrounds

[OT] RE: New 'electrical active' Armour to defeat hand held anti- tank rounds

From: "Robertson, Brendan" <Brendan.Robertson@d...>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 17:12:02 +1000
Subject: [OT] RE: New 'electrical active' Armour to defeat hand held anti- tank rounds

On Thursday, August 22, 2002 4:49 PM, Edward Lipsett
[SMTP:translation@intercomltd.com] wrote:
> Denser?
> Or just thicker?
> 
> on 02.8.22 3:48 PM, Scott Siebold at gamers@ameritech.net scribbleth:
> > 
> > An intersting side issue is glass is a high desity liquid which is
> > slowly moving (glass that is 100+ years old is actually denser at
the
> > base then at the top).

There are two schools of thought on that, neither of which have been
conclusively proven.
1.  The stained glass panes were cast flat and then have pooled towards
the
bottom over time.
2.  The glass panes were cast with thicker bottoms to help support the
weight.

There is evidence to support both hypothesis, and it may be that both
are
true.

Brendan
'Neath Southern Skies

Prev: Re: New 'electrical active' Armour to defeat hand held anti-tank rounds Next: Re: New 'electrical active' Armour to defeat hand held anti-tankrounds