Prev: Re: [SG] UNSCMC Interface Company TO&E Next: Re: [FT] Missile magazines

Re: [FT] Missile magazines

From: Jon Davis <davisje@n...>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 18:10:27 -0400
Subject: Re: [FT] Missile magazines

B Lin wrote:
> 
> I would tend to agree with the view that Magazines and bays are
repairable.  
> In FT, it appears that when a system is hit (i.e. fails a threshold
check) 
> then it represents a system failure that prevents the use of the
system.  
> It does not necessarily represent the actual system being hit,
destroyed, 
> mangled.  The repair roll then represents back-up system, re-routing
or minor 
> repairs that allow the system to be used again.  Multiple failed
repair rolls 
> would indicate that the damage is so severe that such measures are
ineffective.

One of the sillier aspects, of FT, is that, a crippled ship with only
two hull 
boxes left and massive thresholded systems, could, given time, be fully 
functional by that devoted damage control team.

The only systems they couldn't fix are the 'needle beamed' targets.

Prev: Re: [SG] UNSCMC Interface Company TO&E Next: Re: [FT] Missile magazines