Prev: Re: [SG] Discussion about weekend questions Next: Re: REALITY CHECK TIME!

Re: [SG] Another pass through heavy weapons

From: John Atkinson <johnmatkinson@y...>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 15:15:35 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [SG] Another pass through heavy weapons


--- Ryan Gill <rmgill@mindspring.com> wrote:

> >IMHO no-one in their right mind in a theatre with
> armour arround is 
> >going to waste GMS on anything but infantry, that's
> what small arms, 
> >APSW etc are for!
> >
> >Just my thoughts, but yes I feel that they are way
> underpowered
> 
> It's been a pretty consistent thing. Milan used
> against a .50 MG 
> position in the Falklands, Piats against snipers in
> buildings, etc. 
> Give troops a hard target and not an easy way to
> deal with it and 
> they'll use an AT weapon with a significant HE
> effect to sort out the 
> position.

It also helps that the Argentinians didn't have a
single armored vehicle on the Falklands.

John

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Autos - Get free new car price quotes


Prev: Re: [SG] Discussion about weekend questions Next: Re: REALITY CHECK TIME!