Prev: Re: [SG] more ww2 Next: RE: [SG] more ww2

Re: [SG] more ww2

From: John Sowerby <sowerbyj@f...>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 12:04:52 -0400
Subject: Re: [SG] more ww2


>
>I don't like the selection of the 9mmNATO round as a "manstopper".
>Actually, any FMJ or ball round that goes at supersonic speeds seems
>like a bad idea to me.  Anything going that fast that isn't designed to
>"mushroom" or otherwise tranfer energy to the wound instead of carry it
>out the other side of the target is a bad choice IMO.	I'm presuming
>that's what was fired in the UZI's carried boy our SecretService,
right?

To be honest, I can't remember. It's one of those vague memories dragged
up 
from the dim dark recesses of my mind....

John S.

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.375 / Virus Database: 210 - Release Date: 7/10/2002


Prev: Re: [SG] more ww2 Next: RE: [SG] more ww2